
News
Autos
[05/08]
Noble International Announces First Quarter Financial Results
[05/08]
China Automotive Systems To Announce 2008 First Quarter Financial Results on May 14
[05/08]
Toyota projects first full-year profit drop in 7 years
More...
CPSC Recalls
[05/08]
American Honda Motor Co. Recalls ATVs Due to Loss of Steering Control
[05/08]
Fingerhut Recalls Master CraftsPressure Washers Due to Fire Hazard
[05/06]
Playworld Systems Recalls Swing Sets Due to Fall Hazard Caused by Defective Clevises
[05/06]
Williamson-Thermoflo Gas Boilers Recalled Due to Carbon Monoxide Hazard
More...
NHTSA Recalls
[0/0]
More Americans Buckle Up and Wear Their Helmets In 2007
[04/04]
NHTSA Presents Awards for Safety Achievements and Public Service
[03/04]
U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary E. Peters Launches New Service to Automatically E-mail, Instant Message Safety Recall Information
More...
Personal Injury
[05/08]
Minn. gov signs bill to pay bridge collapse victims
[05/08]
Possible tornadoes leave damage in parts of Oklahoma
[05/07]
Truck, school bus crash in Ohio, about 4 children injured
More...
Case Summaries
Injury & Tort Law
[05/07]
Family Home & Fin. Ctr, Inc. v. Fed. Home Loan Mortgage Corp. In mortgage broker's action raising claims against Freddie Mac for intentional interference with contract, unfair competition under California state law, and defamation, summary judgment and a related ruling for Freddie Mac are affirmed where: 1) the intentional interference claim failed as there was no admissible evidence that Freddie Mac influenced or caused another party to terminate its mortgage broker contract with plaintiff, intentionally or otherwise; 2) Freddie Mac's placement of plaintiff on its "Exclusionary List" did not constitute unfair competition; 3) for purposes of the defamation claim, plaintiff failed to show malice to defeat the Common Interest Privilege; and 4) there was no abuse of discretion in denying a request to defer ruling on summary judgment.
[05/07]
Serrano v. Stefan Merli Plastering Co., Inc. Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.510, subdivision (c), and the court's inherent authority to control its ministerial officers and other persons connected with a judicial proceeding in furtherance of justice, authorize the court to require a deposition reporter to provide a copy of a deposition transcript to a non-noticing party in a pending action for a reasonable fee which, in the absence of an agreement between the interested parties, may be set by the court upon a proper evidentiary showing.
[05/06]
Hadley v. Gutierrez In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action involving excessive force claims against defendants-police officers, an order denying defendants' motion for summary judgment seeking qualified immunity is reversed in part where the district court erred in: 1) refusing to grant one defendant qualified immunity on plaintiff's excessive force claim; and 2) refusing to grant qualified immunity to both defendants on plaintiff's conspiracy claim.
More...
Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.
|
Pierce, Herns, Sloan & McLeod, LLC, located in Charleston, South Carolina, serves clients in Charleston, Moncks Corner, Columbia, Myrtle Beach, Florence, Beaufort, Hilton Head, Greenville, Spartanburg, Anderson, Hartsville, Florence, Graniteville and Mount Pleasant. We also serve clients in the Tri County Area of Charleston, Berkley, and Dorchester, as well as Aiken County, Beaufort County, Greenville County, Georgetown County, Colleton County, Jasper County, Horry County, Williamsburg County, Anderson County, Florence County, Sumter County, Richland County, Orangeburg County.
While based in South Carolina, we practice law in all State and Federal Courts throughout the United States. Our attorneys are licensed in South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Colorado, and Washington State.
|